draw.io vs Kandji

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Kandji both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Kandji (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Kandji is slightly ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is clearly ahead of Kandji. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of Kandji. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is ahead of Kandji. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kandji is ahead of draw.io.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Kandji shows 387 stars across 7 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 224.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Kandji looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.