draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.
draw.io vs LinkedIn
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
draw.io and LinkedIn sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is ahead of LinkedIn. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is slightly ahead of LinkedIn. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is ahead of draw.io. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of draw.io.
draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors.
draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. LinkedIn looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | draw.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 43 |
| Code | 39 | 63 |
| Education | 65 | 54 |
| Community | 51 | 49 |
| Reach | 48 | 61 |
| Momentum | 36 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 86,983 | 77,785 |
| Forks | 12,388 | 12,231 |
| Public repos | 32 | 137 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 28 |
| External contributors | 13 | 52 |
| Avg polish | 43 | 64 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 43 |