draw.io vs Matomo Analytics

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io and Matomo Analytics sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of draw.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of draw.io.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Matomo Analytics shows 30,600 stars across 90 public repos, 46 active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Matomo Analytics looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.