draw.io vs Moodle Development

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is ahead of Moodle Development. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 11.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Moodle Development looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.