draw.io vs Qualtrics

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Qualtrics both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), draw.io is ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qualtrics is clearly ahead of draw.io. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is ahead of Qualtrics.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Qualtrics shows 20 stars across 20 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 4349.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Qualtrics looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.