draw.io vs Razorpay

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over draw.io (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 43). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of draw.io. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of draw.io.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 22.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.