draw.io vs Wrike

draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wrike is ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of draw.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is slightly ahead of Wrike.

draw.io carries 86,983 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 315.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

draw.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.