Jina AI vs Johnson & Johnson

Jina AI (Your Search Foundation, Supercharged! (acquired by @elastic 2025/10)) and Johnson & Johnson both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jina AI (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Johnson & Johnson (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 34). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Jina AI is ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jina AI is slightly ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jina AI is ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jina AI is ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jina AI is slightly ahead of Johnson & Johnson.

Jina AI carries 72,580 GitHub stars across 266 public repos, with 13 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. Johnson & Johnson shows 168 stars across 48 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jina AI's footprint is roughly 432.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jina AI is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Johnson & Johnson makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.