Jina AI vs Mage

Jina AI (Your Search Foundation, Supercharged! (acquired by @elastic 2025/10)) and Mage (Magical tools for data.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jina AI (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Mage (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 38). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Jina AI is clearly ahead of Mage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mage is ahead of Jina AI. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jina AI is slightly ahead of Mage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jina AI is ahead of Mage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jina AI is ahead of Mage.

Jina AI carries 72,580 GitHub stars across 266 public repos, with 13 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. Mage shows 9,079 stars across 44 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jina AI's footprint is roughly 8.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Jina AI is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Mage looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.