Johnson & Johnson vs Sardine

Johnson & Johnson and Sardine both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Sardine (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Johnson & Johnson (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 34). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Johnson & Johnson is ahead of Sardine. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sardine is ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sardine is slightly ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Johnson & Johnson is ahead of Sardine.

Johnson & Johnson carries 168 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Sardine shows 19 stars across 55 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Johnson & Johnson's footprint is roughly 8.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Johnson & Johnson is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sardine looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.