Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Johnson & Johnson vs TopK

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Johnson & Johnson and TopK (Pushing state of the art, one flamegraph at a time.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

TopK (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Johnson & Johnson (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 34). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Johnson & Johnson is ahead of TopK. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), TopK is slightly ahead of Johnson & Johnson. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Johnson & Johnson is slightly ahead of TopK. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Johnson & Johnson is ahead of TopK. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), TopK is ahead of Johnson & Johnson.

Johnson & Johnson carries 168 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. TopK shows 87 stars across 12 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Johnson & Johnson is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. TopK looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricJohnson & JohnsonTopK
Ranking
Overall rank#602#536
Pillars
Overall3436
Code4940
Education5459
Community2519
Reach4031
Momentum2031
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars16887
Forks623
Public repos4812
Active repos (90d)88
External contributors16
Avg polish5134
Avg AI-readiness4043

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Johnson & Johnson developer profileView TopK developer profile