Kajabi vs Metabase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Kajabi and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Kajabi (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 32). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Metabase is slightly ahead of Kajabi. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is clearly ahead of Kajabi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is clearly ahead of Kajabi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is clearly ahead of Kajabi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is ahead of Kajabi.
Kajabi carries 99 GitHub stars across 103 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 507.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Kajabi is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Metabase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Kajabi | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #165 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 51 |
| Code | 47 | 49 |
| Education | 51 | 80 |
| Community | 18 | 39 |
| Reach | 11 | 41 |
| Momentum | 44 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 50,225 |
| Forks | 42 | 7,167 |
| Public repos | 103 | 100 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 21 |
| External contributors | 11 | 49 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 30 |