Kajabi vs Sophos
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Kajabi and Sophos both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sophos (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Kajabi (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 32). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Kajabi is ahead of Sophos. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sophos is ahead of Kajabi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sophos is ahead of Kajabi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kajabi is slightly ahead of Sophos.
Kajabi carries 99 GitHub stars across 103 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Sophos shows 1,438 stars across 84 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Sophos's footprint is roughly 14.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Kajabi is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sophos looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Kajabi | Sophos |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 37 |
| Code | 47 | 33 |
| Education | 51 | 68 |
| Community | 18 | 33 |
| Reach | 11 | 11 |
| Momentum | 44 | 42 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 1,438 |
| Forks | 42 | 432 |
| Public repos | 103 | 84 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 7 |
| External contributors | 11 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 22 |