Kajabi vs Perk
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Kajabi and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Perk (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Kajabi (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Kajabi is slightly ahead of Perk. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Perk is slightly ahead of Kajabi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is ahead of Kajabi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Perk is ahead of Kajabi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is slightly ahead of Kajabi.
Kajabi carries 99 GitHub stars across 103 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Kajabi is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Perk looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Kajabi | Perk |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 42 |
| Code | 47 | 44 |
| Education | 51 | 54 |
| Community | 18 | 38 |
| Reach | 11 | 30 |
| Momentum | 44 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 99 | 34 |
| Forks | 42 | 11 |
| Public repos | 103 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 5 |
| External contributors | 11 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 33 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 38 |