Kajabi vs Zammad

Kajabi and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Kajabi (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 32). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of Kajabi. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of Kajabi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Kajabi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Kajabi is ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kajabi is slightly ahead of Zammad.

Kajabi carries 99 GitHub stars across 103 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 64.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Kajabi is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.