kakao vs litellm
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
kakao and litellm both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
kakao (rank #257) holds a meaningful lead over litellm (rank #1114) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 7). The gap of 40 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), kakao is clearly ahead of litellm. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), kakao is clearly ahead of litellm. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), kakao is clearly ahead of litellm. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), litellm is slightly ahead of kakao. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), kakao is clearly ahead of litellm.
kakao carries 6,073 GitHub stars across 71 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. litellm shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
kakao is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. litellm looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | kakao | litellm |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #1114 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 7 |
| Code | 56 | 0 |
| Education | 44 | 0 |
| Community | 51 | 0 |
| Reach | 32 | 40 |
| Momentum | 52 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,073 | 0 |
| Forks | 1,153 | 0 |
| Public repos | 71 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 0 |
| External contributors | 8 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 29 | 0 |