Kandji vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Kandji and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Kandji (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Kandji. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Kandji. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Kandji is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Kandji is slightly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kandji is clearly ahead of Qonto.
Kandji carries 387 GitHub stars across 7 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Kandji is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Kandji | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 43 |
| Code | 44 | 57 |
| Education | 44 | 75 |
| Community | 26 | 25 |
| Reach | 30 | 24 |
| Momentum | 48 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 387 | 501 |
| Forks | 56 | 158 |
| Public repos | 7 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 11 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 29 | 36 |