Kandji vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Kandji and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Kandji (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 30). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Kandji. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Typeform is slightly ahead of Kandji. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Kandji is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of Kandji. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kandji is ahead of Typeform.
Kandji carries 387 GitHub stars across 7 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Kandji is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Kandji | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 50 |
| Code | 44 | 71 |
| Education | 44 | 51 |
| Community | 26 | 25 |
| Reach | 30 | 43 |
| Momentum | 48 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 387 | 590 |
| Forks | 56 | 254 |
| Public repos | 7 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 8 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 29 | 38 |