KAYAK vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
KAYAK and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over KAYAK (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of KAYAK. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), KAYAK is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), KAYAK is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
KAYAK carries 3,186 GitHub stars across 72 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but KAYAK's footprint is roughly 10.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
KAYAK is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. mParticle by Rokt looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | KAYAK | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 43 |
| Code | 59 | 59 |
| Education | 59 | 63 |
| Community | 30 | 38 |
| Reach | 44 | 28 |
| Momentum | 36 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,186 | 317 |
| Forks | 462 | 521 |
| Public repos | 72 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 14 |
| External contributors | 1 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 50 |