KAYAK vs Wrike

KAYAK and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

KAYAK (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), KAYAK is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of KAYAK. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), KAYAK is ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), KAYAK is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), KAYAK is slightly ahead of Wrike.

KAYAK carries 3,186 GitHub stars across 72 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but KAYAK's footprint is roughly 11.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

KAYAK is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.