Creators of the leading privileged access management platform securing organizations against data breaches and cyber threats.
Keeper Security vs Pendo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Keeper Security (Creators of the leading privileged access management platform securing organizations against data breaches and cyber threats.) and Pendo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Keeper Security (rank #278) holds a modest lead over Pendo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 33). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Keeper Security is clearly ahead of Pendo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Keeper Security is ahead of Pendo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pendo is slightly ahead of Keeper Security. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Keeper Security is slightly ahead of Pendo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Keeper Security is slightly ahead of Pendo.
Keeper Security carries 508 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Pendo shows 267 stars across 134 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Keeper Security is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Pendo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Keeper Security | Pendo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 33 |
| Code | 58 | 27 |
| Education | 75 | 61 |
| Community | 39 | 47 |
| Reach | 24 | 23 |
| Momentum | 36 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 508 | 267 |
| Forks | 230 | 88 |
| Public repos | 63 | 134 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 18 |
| External contributors | 32 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 63 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 18 |