Klaviyo vs Razorpay

Klaviyo and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #31) holds a modest lead over Klaviyo (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 48). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Klaviyo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Klaviyo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Klaviyo.

Klaviyo carries 573 GitHub stars across 117 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,812 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 6.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Klaviyo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.