Klaviyo vs Teamwork.com

Klaviyo and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Klaviyo and Teamwork.com sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (48), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Klaviyo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Klaviyo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klaviyo is ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Klaviyo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com.

Klaviyo carries 573 GitHub stars across 117 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Teamwork.com's footprint is roughly 3.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Klaviyo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.