Klaviyo vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Klaviyo and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Klaviyo (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 48). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Klaviyo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klaviyo is clearly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is slightly ahead of Klaviyo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Typeform.
Klaviyo carries 573 GitHub stars across 117 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Klaviyo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Klaviyo | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 50 |
| Code | 54 | 71 |
| Education | 56 | 51 |
| Community | 49 | 25 |
| Reach | 41 | 43 |
| Momentum | 34 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 573 | 590 |
| Forks | 339 | 254 |
| Public repos | 117 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 23 | 8 |
| External contributors | 17 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 38 |