Klaviyo vs Workable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Klaviyo and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Klaviyo (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 35). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klaviyo is clearly ahead of Workable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Workable.
Klaviyo carries 573 GitHub stars across 117 public repos, with 23 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Klaviyo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Workable makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Klaviyo | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 35 |
| Code | 54 | 51 |
| Education | 56 | 56 |
| Community | 49 | 24 |
| Reach | 41 | 41 |
| Momentum | 34 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 573 | 785 |
| Forks | 339 | 135 |
| Public repos | 117 | 96 |
| Active repos (90d) | 23 | 5 |
| External contributors | 17 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 49 |