Let's make work better.
kununu vs Lansweeper NV
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
kununu (Let's make work better.) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
kununu (rank #568) holds a narrow lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #726) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 30). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), kununu is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is ahead of kununu. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), kununu is ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of kununu. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), kununu is ahead of Lansweeper NV.
kununu carries 138 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
kununu is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | kununu | Lansweeper NV |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #568 | #726 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 30 |
| Code | 57 | 0 |
| Education | 42 | 60 |
| Community | 14 | 0 |
| Reach | 44 | 50 |
| Momentum | 38 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 138 | 0 |
| Forks | 16 | 0 |
| Public repos | 40 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 0 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 0 |