kununu vs Qonto

kununu (Let's make work better.) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over kununu (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of kununu. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is ahead of kununu. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), kununu is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), kununu is ahead of Qonto.

kununu carries 132 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 3.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

kununu is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.