kununu vs Skyscanner

kununu (Let's make work better.) and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over kununu (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 34). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of kununu. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of kununu. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of kununu. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), kununu is ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of kununu.

kununu carries 132 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 61.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

kununu is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Skyscanner looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.