Dify is an LLMOps platform that helps you build GPT-based applications easily and intuitively.
LangGenius vs litellm
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LangGenius (Dify is an LLMOps platform that helps you build GPT-based applications easily and intuitively.) and litellm both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LangGenius (rank #152) holds a meaningful lead over litellm (rank #1114) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 7). The gap of 45 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LangGenius is clearly ahead of litellm. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LangGenius is clearly ahead of litellm. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LangGenius is clearly ahead of litellm. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), litellm is slightly ahead of LangGenius. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LangGenius is clearly ahead of litellm.
LangGenius carries 153,705 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 309 external contributors on record. litellm shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
LangGenius is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. litellm looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LangGenius | litellm |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #152 | #1114 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 52 | 7 |
| Code | 59 | 0 |
| Education | 77 | 0 |
| Community | 57 | 0 |
| Reach | 34 | 40 |
| Momentum | 41 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 153,705 | 0 |
| Forks | 29,341 | 0 |
| Public repos | 39 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 0 |
| External contributors | 309 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 45 | 0 |