Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Lansweeper NV vs Metabase

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a meaningful lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 30). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Metabase is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Metabase. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors.

Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Metabase looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLansweeper NVMetabase
Ranking
Overall rank#728#165
Pillars
Overall3051
Code049
Education6080
Community039
Reach5041
Momentum2861
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars050,225
Forks07,167
Public repos0100
Active repos (90d)021
External contributors049
Avg polish050
Avg AI-readiness030

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Lansweeper NV developer profileView Metabase developer profile