All development of lansweeper
Lansweeper NV vs Miro
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 30). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Miro.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Miro looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 38 |
| Code | 0 | 58 |
| Education | 60 | 86 |
| Community | 0 | 32 |
| Reach | 50 | 0 |
| Momentum | 28 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 843 |
| Forks | 0 | 380 |
| Public repos | 0 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 4 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 65 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 32 |