All development of lansweeper
Lansweeper NV vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. mParticle by Rokt looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 43 |
| Code | 0 | 59 |
| Education | 60 | 63 |
| Community | 0 | 38 |
| Reach | 50 | 28 |
| Momentum | 28 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 317 |
| Forks | 0 | 521 |
| Public repos | 0 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 14 |
| External contributors | 0 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 50 |