Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Lansweeper NV vs Paddle

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Paddle both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Paddle (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 30). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Paddle is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Paddle. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Paddle is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Paddle. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Paddle is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Paddle shows 997 stars across 54 public repos, 22 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Paddle looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLansweeper NVPaddle
Ranking
Overall rank#728#372
Pillars
Overall3042
Code061
Education6057
Community041
Reach5023
Momentum2834
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars0997
Forks0650
Public repos054
Active repos (90d)022
External contributors06
Avg polish063
Avg AI-readiness040

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Lansweeper NV developer profileView Paddle developer profile