All development of lansweeper
Lansweeper NV vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recurly (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 44 |
| Code | 0 | 68 |
| Education | 60 | 57 |
| Community | 0 | 34 |
| Reach | 50 | 7 |
| Momentum | 28 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 0 | 700 |
| Public repos | 0 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 26 |
| External contributors | 0 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 37 |