Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Lansweeper NV vs Recurly

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Recurly (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLansweeper NVRecurly
Ranking
Overall rank#728#317
Pillars
Overall3044
Code068
Education6057
Community034
Reach507
Momentum2864
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars01,564
Forks0700
Public repos053
Active repos (90d)026
External contributors05
Avg polish070
Avg AI-readiness037

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Lansweeper NV developer profileView Recurly developer profile