All development of lansweeper
SAP SE, a global software company, is one of the largest vendors of ERP and other enterprise applications.
Lansweeper NV vs SAP
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and SAP (SAP SE, a global software company, is one of the largest vendors of ERP and other enterprise applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SAP (rank #122) holds a meaningful lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 30). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SAP is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SAP is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of SAP. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SAP is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. SAP shows 12,850 stars across 309 public repos, 96 active in the last 90 days and 60 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. SAP looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 54 |
| Code | 0 | 74 |
| Education | 60 | 60 |
| Community | 0 | 55 |
| Reach | 50 | 21 |
| Momentum | 28 | 55 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 12,850 |
| Forks | 0 | 4,069 |
| Public repos | 0 | 309 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 96 |
| External contributors | 0 | 60 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 84 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 38 |