All development of lansweeper
We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Lansweeper NV vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Semrush is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Semrush. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is ahead of Lansweeper NV.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Semrush looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 44 |
| Code | 0 | 44 |
| Education | 60 | 65 |
| Community | 0 | 36 |
| Reach | 50 | 35 |
| Momentum | 28 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 454 |
| Forks | 0 | 124 |
| Public repos | 0 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 2 |
| External contributors | 0 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 32 |