All development of lansweeper
Lansweeper NV vs Softr
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Softr (rank #455) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 30). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Softr is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Softr is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Softr is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Softr. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Softr.
Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors.
Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Softr looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lansweeper NV | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 39 |
| Code | 0 | 27 |
| Education | 60 | 66 |
| Community | 0 | 33 |
| Reach | 50 | 40 |
| Momentum | 28 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 1 |
| Forks | 0 | 2 |
| Public repos | 0 | 2 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 1 |
| External contributors | 0 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 10 |