Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Lansweeper NV vs Workable

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Workable (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 30). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Workable is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Workable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Lansweeper NV carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Lansweeper NV is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Workable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricLansweeper NVWorkable
Ranking
Overall rank#728#569
Pillars
Overall3035
Code051
Education6056
Community024
Reach5041
Momentum2830
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars0785
Forks0135
Public repos096
Active repos (90d)05
External contributors05
Avg polish046
Avg AI-readiness049

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Lansweeper NV developer profileView Workable developer profile