Lightspeed Commerce Inc. vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 38). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc..
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. carries 145 GitHub stars across 6 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lightspeed Commerce Inc. | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 45 |
| Code | 51 | 76 |
| Education | 69 | 65 |
| Community | 33 | 39 |
| Reach | 15 | 37 |
| Momentum | 28 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 145 | 337 |
| Forks | 19 | 199 |
| Public repos | 6 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 33 |
| External contributors | 2 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 61 |