Linear vs Qonto

Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 43). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Linear. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Linear. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Linear is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is ahead of Qonto.

Linear carries 1,971 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Linear's footprint is roughly 3.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Linear is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.