A purpose-built tool for planning and building products
Linear vs Sumo Logic, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) and Sumo Logic, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over Sumo Logic, Inc. (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 41). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Linear. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Linear is ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Linear. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc..
Linear carries 1,971 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Sumo Logic, Inc. shows 1,842 stars across 107 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 14 external contributors.
Linear is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sumo Logic, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Linear | Sumo Logic, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #103 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 55 | 41 |
| Code | 45 | 50 |
| Education | 56 | 47 |
| Community | 36 | 42 |
| Reach | 76 | 23 |
| Momentum | 41 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,971 | 1,842 |
| Forks | 436 | 1,655 |
| Public repos | 22 | 107 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 27 |
| External contributors | 21 | 14 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 39 |