A purpose-built tool for planning and building products
Linear vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 35). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Linear is ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Linear. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Linear is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of UXPin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is slightly ahead of UXPin.
Linear carries 1,971 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Linear is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UXPin looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Linear | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #103 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 55 | 35 |
| Code | 45 | 30 |
| Education | 56 | 66 |
| Community | 36 | 13 |
| Reach | 76 | 39 |
| Momentum | 41 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,971 | 879 |
| Forks | 436 | 117 |
| Public repos | 22 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 3 |
| External contributors | 21 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 21 |