LinkedIn vs Moodle Development

LinkedIn and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LinkedIn is ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is ahead of Moodle Development. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

LinkedIn carries 77,785 GitHub stars across 137 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 10.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

LinkedIn is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Moodle Development makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.