LinkedIn vs Sumo Logic, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LinkedIn and Sumo Logic, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Sumo Logic, Inc. (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 41). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc..
LinkedIn carries 77,785 GitHub stars across 137 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors on record. Sumo Logic, Inc. shows 1,842 stars across 107 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 14 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 42.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
LinkedIn is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sumo Logic, Inc. makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Sumo Logic, Inc. | |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 41 |
| Code | 63 | 50 |
| Education | 54 | 47 |
| Community | 49 | 42 |
| Reach | 61 | 23 |
| Momentum | 37 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 77,785 | 1,842 |
| Forks | 12,231 | 1,655 |
| Public repos | 137 | 107 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 27 |
| External contributors | 52 | 14 |
| Avg polish | 64 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 39 |