Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
LiveChat vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a modest lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 42). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of LiveChat. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of LiveChat. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of LiveChat.
LiveChat carries 755 GitHub stars across 168 public repos, with 24 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
LiveChat is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LiveChat | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #141 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 53 | 42 |
| Code | 54 | 59 |
| Education | 80 | 52 |
| Community | 36 | 42 |
| Reach | 50 | 23 |
| Momentum | 35 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 755 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 335 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 168 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 24 | 31 |
| External contributors | 13 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 48 |