Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
LiveChat vs Softr
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Softr (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 39). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Softr. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is ahead of Softr. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LiveChat is slightly ahead of Softr. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is ahead of Softr. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LiveChat is ahead of Softr.
LiveChat carries 755 GitHub stars across 168 public repos, with 24 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LiveChat's footprint is roughly 755.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
LiveChat is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Softr makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LiveChat | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #141 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 53 | 39 |
| Code | 54 | 27 |
| Education | 80 | 66 |
| Community | 36 | 33 |
| Reach | 50 | 40 |
| Momentum | 35 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 755 | 1 |
| Forks | 335 | 2 |
| Public repos | 168 | 2 |
| Active repos (90d) | 24 | 1 |
| External contributors | 13 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 10 |