Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.
LiveChat vs Spreedly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) and Spreedly (Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a meaningful lead over Spreedly (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 30). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LiveChat is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Spreedly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LiveChat is ahead of Spreedly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is ahead of Spreedly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LiveChat is ahead of Spreedly.
LiveChat carries 755 GitHub stars across 168 public repos, with 24 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Spreedly shows 418 stars across 67 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
LiveChat is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Spreedly makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LiveChat | Spreedly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #141 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 53 | 30 |
| Code | 54 | 50 |
| Education | 80 | 50 |
| Community | 36 | 19 |
| Reach | 50 | 40 |
| Momentum | 35 | 19 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 755 | 418 |
| Forks | 335 | 286 |
| Public repos | 168 | 67 |
| Active repos (90d) | 24 | 10 |
| External contributors | 13 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 30 |