Lodgify vs Okta, Inc
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Lodgify and Okta, Inc both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a meaningful lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 30). The gap of 28 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Okta, Inc is ahead of Lodgify. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Okta, Inc is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Lodgify.
Lodgify carries 13 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Okta, Inc shows 6,250 stars across 88 public repos, 44 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Okta, Inc's footprint is roughly 480.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Lodgify is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Okta, Inc looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Lodgify | Okta, Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #73 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 58 |
| Code | 36 | 66 |
| Education | 65 | 77 |
| Community | 8 | 42 |
| Reach | 7 | 29 |
| Momentum | 39 | 45 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 13 | 6,250 |
| Forks | 76 | 5,038 |
| Public repos | 16 | 88 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 44 |
| External contributors | 0 | 52 |
| Avg polish | 35 | 66 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 24 | 48 |