Lodgify vs Squarespace

Lodgify and Squarespace both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Squarespace (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Squarespace. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Squarespace. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Squarespace is ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Squarespace is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Squarespace is slightly ahead of Lodgify.

Lodgify carries 13 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Squarespace shows 2,038 stars across 98 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Squarespace's footprint is roughly 156.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Lodgify is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Squarespace looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.