Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.
LogRocket vs Proton Mail
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) and Proton Mail both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LogRocket (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Proton Mail (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 41). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Proton Mail is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LogRocket is ahead of Proton Mail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Proton Mail is ahead of LogRocket.
LogRocket carries 6,668 GitHub stars across 16 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Proton Mail shows 16,265 stars across 186 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors.
LogRocket is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Proton Mail looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LogRocket | Proton Mail |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 41 |
| Code | 46 | 64 |
| Education | 62 | 42 |
| Community | 23 | 46 |
| Reach | 22 | 44 |
| Momentum | 43 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,668 | 16,265 |
| Forks | 379 | 2,240 |
| Public repos | 16 | 186 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 19 |
| External contributors | 2 | 20 |
| Avg polish | 42 | 74 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 20 | 32 |